Abstract
The current research examined the observed impact of parental and social force on people’ perceptions regarding cross-cultural and interfaith dating and wedding. The concerns of great interest had been: (1) what’s the impact of parental attitudes towards interfaith and relationships that are cross-cultural? (2) how can the participants feel it impacts upon them? Not only that, (3) Just how can the individuals predict they shall react to their children’s range of such relationships? Fifty-five college pupils with diverse backgrounds took part in this research. The findings suggest that most the individuals had been affected by the pressure that is social upon them. More over, the individuals identified the generation that is previous “racist”. Nonetheless, interestingly you will find signs of a generational mindset change. Finally, the findings reveal that more than 80 percent for the participants failed to like to interfere within their children’s partner selection. The rest of the 20 per cent had been against interfaith and dating that is cross-cultural marriages.
That is a preview of subscription content, access via your organization.
Access choices
Purchase article that is single
Access immediately to your full article PDF.
Tax calculation shall be finalised during checkout.
Donate to journal
Immediate on line access to all the presssing dilemmas from 2019. Subscription will auto renew yearly.
Tax calculation shall be finalised during checkout.
Notes
It must be noted that relationship is generally speaking perhaps not appropriate when you look at the Arab and community that is muslim others) unless the couple’s intention will be date solely (but, particular restrictions may nevertheless use, e.g., limiting sexual activities) along with the try to get married. Furthermore, in many cases, the approval of this female’s daddy ( or other significant male figure) is necessary to enable this relationship to transpire. This matter had been addressed through the assortment of the information so that you can respect participants’ social traditions and observing that is religious.
Recommendations
Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial discussion: Uncertainty, understanding, together with growth of social relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social therapy (pp. 122–144). Oxford: Blackwell.
Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal interaction: Theoretical perspectives, future leads. Journal of correspondence, 55(3), 415–447.
Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? a longitudinal test associated with contact theory among bulk and minority groups in three countries in europe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843.
Boker, A. (2008). Kiryat Gat: Racist campaign against Bedouin males dating women that are jewish. nana10. Retrieved 31, 2013, from http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=563227 december.
Bost, S. (2010). Mulattas and mestizas: Representing identities that are mixed the Americas, 1850–2000. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Changing qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Ny, NY: Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in therapy. Qualitative analysis in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Cila, J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013). Private openness toward interfaith dating and wedding among Muslim teenagers: The part of religiosity, social identification, and household connectedness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430213502561.
Cohen, A. B. (2009). Numerous types of tradition. US Psychologist, 64, 194–204.
Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic views on sex as well as the social context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social problems, 49, 53–59.
Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental disturbance and intimate love: the Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Structure, 24, 1–10.
Eggert, L. L., & Parks, M. R. (1987). Correspondence community participation in adolescents’ friendships and relationships that are romantic. Correspondence Yearbook, 10, 283–322.
Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t sleep around like White girls do”: Family, culture, and sex in Filipina American everyday lives. Indication, 26, 415–440.
Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., & Hoffman www.besthookupwebsites.org/transgenderdate-review/, N. G. (2012). Predictors of buddy approval for intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–15.
Felmlee, D. (2003). Connection in social support systems. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social therapy (pp. 389–409). Nyc: Plenum.
Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Intimate lovers’ perceptions of social networking features aided by the passing of relationship and time transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.
Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and design that is qualitative academic research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Harris, T. M., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of race for starting a relationship that is romantic. Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–64.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1950). Cultural factors within the collection of marriage mates. United States Sociological Review, 15, 619–627.
Kalmijn, M. (1998). Homogamy and intermarriage: Reasons, patterns, styles. Yearly Report About Sociology, 395–421.
Lasson, K. (2008). Bloodstains on a Code of Honor: The marginalization that is murderous of in the Islamic World. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 30, 407.
Lewis, R. (1973). Personal effect and also the development of dyads: An interactionist approach to mate selection. Sociometry, 34, 409–418.
Madek, C. A. (2005). Killing dishonor: Effective eradication of honor killing. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 29, 53.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: helpful tips to design and implementation. London: Wiley.
Moore, R. M. (2000). An exploratory research of interracial dating on a tiny university campus. Sociological Viewpoints, 16, 46–64.
Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence systems together with growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease theory. Human Correspondence Research, 10, 55–79.
Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence systems together with growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Research, 10(1), 55–79.
Reich, W. A., Ramos, J. M., & Jaipal, R. (2000). Cultural identification and interethnic dating in Portuguese adults that are young. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 153–161.
Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and social help determinants of relationship dedication. personal Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.
Sprecher, S. (2011). The impact of social networking sites on intimate relationships: Through the lens associated with the social networking. Personal Relationships, 18(4), 630–644.
Telles, E. E., & Sue, C. A. (2009). Race combination: Boundary crossing in comparative viewpoint. Sociology, 35(1), 129.
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and types of qualitative meeting studies. Ny: The Complimentary Press.
Yahya, S., Bekerman, Z., Sagy, S., & Boag, S. (2012). Whenever training satisfies conflict: Palestinian and Jewish–Israeli parental attitudes towards comfort education that is promoting. Journal of Peace Education, 9, 297–320.
Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-a). Facets affecting attitudes towards cross-cultural and dating that is interfaith wedding. Marriage and Family Review.
Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-b). “Sadly, not all the love affairs are supposed to be…” Attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural dating and marriages in an area that is conflict-ridden. Middle East Journal.